Saturday, 17 May 2014

Confronting Anti-Semitism, Part II

Components of the Phenomenon

Lately I have come across quite a few essays by otherwise seemingly intelligent and normal people who, when confronted by the acts of unspeakable brutality and inhumanity by Boko Haram and similar terrorist groups, try to explain, rationalize and even justify such collective performance of abduction, rape, slavery and murder.  As in cases of liberal (so called) arguments to see in Hamas, Hisbolah and other fanatical gangs of thugs political reasons, such as asymmetrical warfare (hence to call terrorist groups “militants” or somewhat less rarely these days “freedom fighters”), with blame going on “the state terrorism” of Israel or some worldwide Jewish conspiracy, these essays repeatedly point to the endemic poverty, disenfranchisement and colonized status of the perpetrators.  Not only are the crimes against humanity seen as the natural or logical outcome of the oppression of these nasty collections of violent men, but they are essentially seen as victims of imperialist, capitalist or statist elites.

But when the leader of Turkey, for instance, confronts grieving and angry relatives of miners killed in Soma and they shake their fists at him, bang on his car, and call him a murderer, he responds—not just as one of his minders did by kicking one of the protesters who had been forced down already by military police—by calling them “Israeli sperms,” we know something is going on which long precedes the immediate crisis.  When, too, the blame for the accident down in the mines and other difficulties in the economy of Turkey is blamed on Zionist and Jewish instigators, provocateurs and agents, the very sanity of the leaders and others in such a nation comes under suspicion.  The leader calls his opponents "Israeli scum (or sperm)."  

Then we have to see if there is a connection between rebel nationalist armies, terrorist bands causing havoc and mayhem and suicide bombers, on the one hand, and the rogue leaders or leaders of rogue states superficially and egregiously acting as “legitimate” governments—when what motivates them is something they articulate in the language of anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism.  While the active operatives may have a variety of mental illnesses that make them susceptible to the pressures of powerful men, groups and institutions, so that seek to relieve horrible pains within, escape from haunting memories of abuse, and act out bizarre mythical roles assigned to them by the society they belong to, the larger configuration of the world-wide phenomena associated with this attempt to annihilate the Jewish homeland and the Jewish people wherever they happen to live cannot be diagnosed or treated in terms of their single experiences. 

Something deeply twisted occurs in the minds over a long period of time to nations.  The deformation occurs in the foetal stage, in the process of birthing, and in the earliest months and years when the child is integrated into society, beginning with the home environment.  How the pregnant mother is treated—what she eats, what she does, and how she feels about herself in response to how others relate to her—shapes the conditions in which the incipient human child grows up,.  Putting aside all the genetic flaws, illnesses and possible accidents that occur, the mothering body provides the hormonal signals that stimulate and inhibit the ontological emergence of the foetal body and mind.  The fears, anxieties, wants and joys are articulated in her person and thus on to the growing being in her womb.  The child within may also be responding to the movements, sounds and social atmosphere outside in the domestic and communal environment the mother passes through.  

These phenomena form part of the historical matrix of the foetus.  Similarly the process of birthing sends all sorts of signals to the emergent infant, with the stresses and strains of the mother’s labour, the hormones released and the other electro-chemical changes that occur at this time.  The ambient environment—the people present, the interactions between them, the noises, smells, physical and emotional conditions, the historical matrix—supplements in a significant way the natural unfolding of the drama.  Then the earliest experiences of the neonate, its warm or cold attachments to the mother and other care givers, supporters or hostile agents, real or imaginary that determine the maternal attitude, its continuing release of triggering hormones—these all provide the emotional and physical environment.  In particular, the infant-mother gaze operates to stimulate and inhibit the neuronal activity of the young brain, with the deep and unconscious unresolved tensions of her own intra-uterine and birthing experiences.  In short, it is not so  much some later intellectual or political crisis that brings out anti-Semitic attitudes: but rather long-term propensities towards victimizing others—socially and historically coded into the language, images and gestures of Judeophobia—that provide whole age-cohorts to share in an acceptable and temporary comforting release from the tensions and anxieties of dysfunctional national development.  The articulation appears in group fantasies (shared waking dreams) and collective trance (or trance-like) events.


Now this leaves two important questions to be answered, since this basic psychohistorical premise is set forth.  On the one hand, the question is where and how does the myth of hatred of Jews arise, since it appears not only where there are no Jews present both geographically and historically, and when it does have some oblique pertinence to real living persons, their culture and history, it has been noted long before any of the supposed economic, religious or social conditions supposedly given as causal arguments exist.  On the other hand, granted those same psychohistorical processes at work both causing anti-Semitism and creating the personality structures, communal institutions and intellectual traditions that make Jews stand out as different—to some degree or other, or just enough to stimulate the abhorrence and fear by others—how is, particularly in our own day, that so many nominal Jews themselves believe in and act in ways that are anti-Semitic?

No comments:

Post a Comment