It was not
just the pizza in Sydney coming close to the elusive tastes and smells of my
childhood I have searched for ever since, but it was also the waiters and the
atmosphere. They come from a world all
but lost. Like the conversations with
the Jews of Melbourne, with their warm personalities and grief-driven pasts, a
reminder of what might have been had I never left Boro Park, had the world not
collapsed in the events of the last century, and had not my own self resisted
each new environment. This is the tragic
paradox of history.
Two
statements in the morning newspapers: (1) “If the pre-school schedule is
reduced,” said a frantic working mother, “I will have to stay at home and look
after my children”; and (2) “I am sixty-five,” said a hard-boiled journalist on
the morning of his retirement, “and do not want to learn anything new.” Not only could these remarks have been
phrased more felicitously so as to mask the impressions of selfishness and
willful ignorance, but the underlying changes in the way people think of the way
they fit into society could have been made clearer and less aggressive. It will probably take generations for people
to be able to talk about their “issues” without using jargon and catch-phrases,
to find a balance between individuality and responsibility, and to appreciate
the creative tensions in their ability to create knowledge and take care of
their families. Meanwhile, the rest of
us will have to suffer.
The horrid
history of the past century has overwhelmed the fantasies of the
nineteenth. Unimaginative men and women
did what the most poetic minds could never reach, not even Mirbeau in The Garden of Torments or Poe in his Pit and Pendulum. Is it therefore true that there can be no
literature after the Holocaust or must we take our own novels and verses as the
secret places where the imagination has gone to rest and recuperate?
He is now
over ninety and every week he walks past the photographs of his adolescent sisters
in the Holocaust Museum. They are beautiful
young girls. He asks everyone he meets
there” Why? My only answer: “If there were reasons; it would not have happened!”
I force
myself to read what the anti-Semites write.
Lies, distortions and slanders to be sure, but nothing in their ravings
matches the dutiful and endless lists of deportees to the death camps and
crematoria.
If Socrates
had been a rabbi, he would not have said he knew nothing and then tricked his
interlocutors into confessing their own ignorance. He would have shown how his own knowledge was
based on his teachers and on his pupils. When his disciples argued with him on
this and every other point, basing their arguments on his authority, they would
laugh together.
I was not
born until five years after Alfred Dreyfus died. It took another seventy years before his fate
touched my own. He was such a different
man than anyone I knew, it frightens me that we might never have become close
friends.
At an Eugène
Atget exhibition in Sydney I see sepia photographs of Paris, with a grainy play
of light and shadow, and slide into a past I never knew. At first, the only living things to be
encountered are sleeping kittens curled up before ancient doorways. Then shadows appear in the windows, figures
lurk in doorways, and someone who looks like me sits inconspicuously in a dark
corner of the street.
No comments:
Post a Comment